Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Selected Sections. Thinking, Fast and Slow.

Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Selected Sections. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.

  • Chapter 1: the characters of the story
    • System 1: operates automatically and quickly and effortlessly
      • System 1 cannot be turned off (25)
    • System 2: with effortful mental activities and complex computations, involving agency, choice, and concentration (21)
      • System 2 needs attention and are disrupted when attention is drawn away (22)
      • System 2 is mobilized when System 1 does not offer an answer (24)
    • focus on system 1:
      • “System 1 as effortlessly originating impressions and feelings that are the main sources of the explicit beliefs and deliberate choices of System 2” (21)
  • Chapter 2: Attention and Effort
    • Kahneman’s book: Attention and Effort
    • attention and the changes in pupils
  • Chapter 3: the Lazy Controller
    • Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi: the study of “effortless attending”
    • “flow:” “a state of effortless concentration so deep that they lose their sense of time, of themselves, of their problems” and the joy of that state is called an “optimal experience” (40)
      • So concentrated that they forget themselves and the surrounding settings.
    • 3 questions:
      • (1) bat and ball
      • (2) roses and flowers: the flower syllogism
      • (3) crimes in Michigan
      • Kahneman requests participants to answer with intuition:
        • “Do not try to solve it but listen to your intuition” (44)
        • “”
      • But he uses how students collaborate by following his requirement as their cognitive flaws. He discriminates them
        • 50% students at Harvard, MIT, and Princeton gave incorrect answers; over 80% from less selective universities (45)
        • “People who say 10cents appear to be ardent followers of the law of least effort. People who avoid that answer appear to have more active minds.” (45)
        • “They apparently find cognitive effort at least mildly unpleasant and avoid it as much as possible” (45)
        • “Failing these minitests appears to be… a matter of insufficient motivation, not trying hard enough. Anyone who can be admitted to a good university is certainly able to reason through the first two questions…” (46)
        • “‘Lazy’ is a harsh judgement…but it does not seem to be unfair” (46)
      • Further, he evokes the research by Walter Mischel and University of Oregon to connect cognitive control with intelligence (47)
        • kids who can be resisters to Oreos were less likely to take drugs and have higher scores on tests of intelligence (47)
        • intelligence and the control of attention (47)
        • those who are prone to accept suggestions by System 1 are “impulsive, impatient, and keen to receive immediate gratification” (48)
        • Keith Stanovich: “superficial or ‘lazy’ thinking is a flaw in the reflective mind, a failure of rationality” (49)
      • All of the these are stigmatizations to the anything that is not logocentric. It stigmatizes the epistemological values in emotion and body. The narrative is full of neurodiscrimination and ableism
  • Chapter 35: Two Selves
  • Conclusions
    • Topics of the book
      • two characters: System 1 & System 2
      • two species: Econs & Humans
      • two selves: experiencing self (do the living) & remembering self (make decisions)
    • Two selves
      • remembering self: a construction of System 2
      • “duration neglect” and “peak-end” (in System 1), but they affect System 2’s decision (409)
      • the remembering self ignores the duration, and emphasizes peaks and ends
        • results: in favor of a short period of intense joy over a long period of moderate happiness
        • offer distorted reflections of actual experience
      • In contrast, “the duration-weighted conception of well-being” (409)
        • the remembering self (about what people want) and the experiencing self (about what actually happens) must both be considered
    • Econs and Humans
      • rationality:
        • not about whether reasonable
        • but about whether they are consistent (coherence)
        • freedom has a cost: because individuals make mistakes, and the society needs to help them
          • rational agents do not make mistakes, so for the economists of the Chicago school, freedom is free of charge (412)
      • normal choice vs the deviation from the normal
        • deviation from the normal: need more effortful deliberation
    • Two Systems
      • organizations are better than individuals when it comes to avoid errors, because organizations are slower